Combined Standard Uncertainty Calculator
Enter the standard uncertainties of your measurements and their sensitivity coefficients, and get the combined standard uncertainty. Choose independent components or a pair with a correlation.
Combined standard uncertainty u_c
0.223607
Expanded uncertainty U = k × u_c = 0.447214
Component 1
Component 2
Standard uncertainties are standard deviations, not plus-minus limits. Use the independent formula only if you have no reason to expect a shared error source.
How it works
- Pick independent components, or a correlated pair.
- Enter each standard uncertainty (a standard deviation) and its sensitivity coefficient; leave 1 if the quantity is added directly.
- For a pair, enter the correlation between −1 and 1.
- Read the combined uncertainty, optionally multiply by a coverage factor you choose, and copy it.
What people use it for
A measurement with several error sources
Combine the repeatability of a gauge, its calibration and the resolution of a display into one figure.
Seeing what correlation changes
Compare the same two components at a correlation of −1, 0 and +1.
Checking a lab spreadsheet
Verify a root-sum-square by hand against a second tool.
Questions
- What is the formula?
- For independent components u_c = √(Σ (a × u)²). For two components with correlation ρ: u_c = √((a₁u₁)² + (a₂u₂)² + 2 × a₁ × a₂ × ρ × u₁ × u₂), kept at 0 if rounding makes it slightly negative.
- Can I combine plus-minus tolerances this way?
- No. A tolerance printed on a drawing is a limit, not a standard deviation, and combining limits this way gives no probability. Use the worst-case tolerance stack-up page for limits.
- What does the coverage factor do?
- It multiplies the combined uncertainty to give an expanded uncertainty, U = k × u_c. A factor of 2 is a common convention for roughly 95 % coverage only when the result is close to normally distributed. You choose k; the page does not claim a probability.
- How do I know whether two errors are correlated?
- If one error source affects both quantities (the same gauge, the same temperature), they are probably correlated. If you do not know, the independent formula is an assumption you should state.